Gossard’s Vintage Rose reviewed… War on Plus Four style

Vintage Rose Gossard Lingerie Teal

Gossard’s Vintage Rose padded plunge (30-38 A-G) caught my eye against my will. Gossard are on The Naughty List for using a +4 calculator with no fitting advice whatsoever, and giving them money is the last thing I want to do right now.

But maybe I’m being to harsh to Gossard. This is their bra, after all. They made it, and they know how it should fit. I should give them a chance. It is very beautiful, after all…

Gossard Bra Size Calculator

Their helpful bra size calculator informs me I am not the 30G I thought I was, but a much more conventional 34D.  This seems a bit off, but they do say that:

“Please note that this calculator is intended only as a guide and is most accurate between cup sizes A-DD – it should be used as a starting point for finding your perfect fit. Because we know every one of our Gossard Girls is unique we recommend that ladies with a cup size of above a DD get fitted in-store for an accurate measurement.” 

I’m a 34D, so this should be just about ‘accurate’ for a ‘starting point’. There are no visual guides to what I’m looking for beyond that ‘starting point’, so I’ll just look at their models to make sure I’m on the right track.

Gossard Badly Fitting Bra

In a 34D, the Vintage Rose presses my boobs back in to my chest, creating a two large and smooshed orbs. It feels kind of precarious and I have quadraboob, but from what I can tell from the website that’s about right. The center gore is not on my sternum and the wires aren’t encasing my boobs – usually a deal breaker for me, but looking at the model I think that’s how it’s supposed to be. I can feel my boobs shifting and have to tuck them back in to position often to keep the bra sitting in the right place – but the models are just standing kinda vacantly doing nothing, so perhaps that’s my fault for moving around.

I definitely have a Christina Hendricks thing going on, and I’m pretty sure this is the sort of cleavage that could stop people noticing what my face looks like. But this Vintage Rose is just not comfortable. I’m surprised that an established brand like Gossard would bother making a bra that can barely fulfils its primary function. It’s hardly containing my boobs, and the squish is hot and uncomfortable. I can’t do anything without having to readjust – which I imagine would be kind of embarrassing if I were at the office or on the train. As a bra reviewer, the Vintage Rose 34D is hopeless and definitely not for me. Though perhaps, if I didn’t know what a bra should feel like, I would probably keep it – I mean, that’s what all bras feel like, right?

80+% of women are wearing badly fitting bras. Gossard: your ineffective and overly simple fitting calculator, especially combined with the hopeless fit of your models, is part of the problem. Your misinformation keeps women in a fit that is uncomfortable and unsupportive, keeps them hating their body and assuming that they are freakishly big and simply stuck with boobs that can’t stay in bras. I’d say your customers deserve better than that.  Take a look at your website, remove that calculator and think again about what a message like “get the perfect fit” actually means. It’s time to change.

This is the War on Plus Four.

P.S: when trying the bra in a rather better starting-point size of 30G the Vintage Rose is is not a bad little bra. It runs firm in the back and slightly small in the cup, and gives a lovely shape. It would be a great purchase for women with boobs that tend to be more dense at the bottom. Or at least, it might be if you had a good understanding of your own bra size and what constitues a good fit…

The misinformation must end!

Posted in Reviews, War on Plus Four | Tagged , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Figloving: figleaves.com Fortune bikini reviewed

Figleaves Swim Review Fortune Underwired Halter BikiniI’ve been championing Figleaves.com’s gorgeous Midnight Grace range for a while now, and when I saw this emerald Fortune figleaves.com beauty I had to try it for myself (it actually isn’t part of the Midnight Grace range, but the halter silhouette is very similar). It is spring, after all…

First things first: I’m no swimwear model, but this bikini looked miles better on me than it does on this regulation hottie pictured above. I’ve brought this up before, but sometimes the bad fit often on shown on Figleaves.com makes it impossible to guess what something might look at on, for better or for worse. Whereas above the chest looks oddly smoothed (*ahem* airbrushing? *ahem*), it actually gives a full and uplifted cleavage. And the touch of the ‘ouch zone’ there is about her underarm above also doesn’t seem to happen in the flesh. Well fitted, the Fortune has a twist of 50s retro and is truly stunning. In fact, I felt rather like Jasmine from Aladdin in it. Although without the tame tiger companion and awesome turquoise pants.

I tried a 30G and it fitted me almost perfectly; though were I fitting a bra I’d be concerned that the center gore (which comes up balconette high) tips forward slightly, which may shift and irritate if you were planning on wearing it as a bra or on a very active day. (I think this is because the halter straps are so far apart with a very skinny back band – the back band would definitely need widening to support a G+ cup). But for an average beach/pool holiday, it does everything you need it to and more – because it really does flatter curves and make you feel like a (spunky runaway animated Arabian) princess. A real gem.

The Fortune is a available in sizes from 30B – 36G, and pretty good value at £26 bikini and £18 bottom. Now, if they could only find away of expanding those size ranges…

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Curvy Kate announce UK Top 30!

Curvy Kate Top 30And they’re off… D+ champions Curvy Kate revealed the top thirty for this year’s UK and Ireland Star in a Bra contest this afternoon. The unanimously beautiful class of 2012 are now hoping for your precious three votes to send them all the way to the top 10 and that ultimate prize.

Voting starts here… Use them wisely: VOTE FOR YOUR FAVOURITES!

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Study finds +4 method “not accurate”

The Sagging Boobie Trap Bra Fitting Poster

A new study by the rather awesome Department of Sport and Exercise Science at the University of Portsmouth “has confirmed that the traditional method of bra fitting is not accurate when compared to published best-fit criteria”.

In the first scientific study of it’s kind, by comparing the ‘traditional’ +4 method practiced by most high-street stores and websites to a ‘professional’ fitting method based on identifying good fit through a sequence of criteria (e.g center band sitting on sternum, cups fully encasing the breast tissue, etc), the study found that:

“The best-fit size determined by the professional bra fitting criteria was, on average, one cup size larger and one band size smaller than the bra size determined by the traditional bra fitting method.”

“Due to the relationship between band and cup size, determined by the cross-grading method, wearing a bra with a loose under band may mean that the cup size is too small. This is supported by the results of this study as the traditional method of bra fitting underestimated cup size in 84% of women.”

Perhaps no surprise there. Other interesting findings suggested that:

“the larger the band size measured, the greater the difference between the best-fit band size and the traditional band size. This suggests that the larger the woman’s band size (as assessed using professional bra fitting criteria), the more erroneous the traditional method became.”

“this study found no relationship between age and fit method, suggesting that women of all ages should be encouraged to use professional bra fitting criteria.”

In conclusion, as well as accepting that more research needed to be done in to understanding the consequences of wearing poorly fitting lingerie, the study emphasises the importance of replacing the traditional fitting method with the professional one in all instances, and (most importantly) giving women the tools and information they need to recognise a professional fit for themselves.

“Women are therefore urged to ensure they are wearing a bra with a firm under band, and that if they decrease their band size then they may need to increase their cup size. It is important that women realise there may be discrepancies in bra sizing between manufacturers and that their body shape may influence bra fit. A woman’s breasts will change size and shape throughout the menstrual cycle and throughout the life cycle, so frequent evaluation of bra fit is necessary.”

Whilst admitting that getting standardised sizing across all brands would be impossible, by providing women with visual aids, and education on the ‘cross-grading’ of sizes it is possible to raise awareness and improve women’s ability to recognise good fit regardless of traditional fitting advice.

“There is scope to utilise the professional bra fitting criteria within educational material to achieve this aim, perhaps as part of display material in changing cubicles at retail outlets or delivered to school-age children so knowledge of bra fitting is gained at an early age. […]

“Women should subjectively assess their own bra fit using professional bra fitting criteria. Larger-breasted women in particular should be wary of using the traditional method of bra fitting to dictate absolute bra size, due to greater inaccuracies in band size as this measure increases. More education is needed so that women can accurately assess their own bra fit. This study recommends that women follow professional bra fitting criteria for appropriate bra fit.”

Amen to that.

This is a great boost for the War on Plus Four and its battle against arbitrary fit calculators and their irresponsible fitting advice – and while something tells me it won’t change much in the minds of Victoria’s Secret et al, it will be interesting to see if by sharing the study we can get more women thinking twice about the bad fit they’ve always accepted to be theirs.

Because as the study says, education really is our best weapon against companies still trying to fit our boobs in to as few sizes as possible, regardless of our comfort or happiness. So if you do one thing today, pass the good fit message on.

[What Most People Don’t Know About Bra Sizes]

Thanks to Kim for sharing this report with me. Find the whole thing here:

 

Posted in News, War on Plus Four | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Kim Kardashian posts ugly pictures. THE HORROR.

Kim Kardashian posts ugly pictures of self

This is kind of an old story, but as it’s still kicking about in all of my RSS feeds it must still be doing the rounds – and therefore people must still be gobbling this up. The news? Reality megastar and, erm, other-things-too-I-assume Kim Kardashian has – shock horror – posted ugly pictures of herself on to her blog. Oh the inhumanity. Brace yourselves, this is NOT going to be pretty.

It’s horrible, isn’t it? I mean truly – HOW am I supposed to go about my evening now those DEPRAVED pictures have crossed before my retinas? WHY would anyone release these monstrosities in to a world with children in?

Ak.

If that’s ugly, there is no word in this world strong enough to describe me after ET dies.

Don’t get me wrong, I know millions of beautiful women out there genuinely believe they are plain, or suffer moments of insecurity about the way they look – who feel pressured to change who they are to fit in with what they feel they should be. Hell, I know hundreds of them. It can be annoying and frustrating to listen to, but we all understand that insecurity. We all understand what it’s like to live in a world with such pressure to look a certain way, and where ‘hotness’ is so often celebrated above than intelligence, talent, or kindness.

But Kim Kardashian (or Kelly Brook, as I wrote a while ago) are different, because their physical beauty is validated by fame and masses of cash. They are paid for being beautiful, and accordingly become part of the machine that upholds a certain beauty as the ideal. I’m not saying they can’t think they’re having an off day, but COME ON!  Has she confused the definition of ‘ugly’ with ‘face expression emotions other than doe-eyed sexy pout’? Because I pull that particular face almost every time I log in to Twitter. Or indeed, read a Kardashian blog…

This is not KK bashing post – I literally don’t know enough about the woman to have a fully formed opinion (although- sure – ideally role models to young girls would not have found fame and fortune through leaked sex tapes and Paris Hilton’s socialite mentoring scheme) – but this sort of thing drives me bananas. Why can’t Kim Kardashian be honest, and say “check me out – I’m technically hotter wailing like a banshee than you were on your wedding day: thanks gene pool lottery, privileged upbringing, and army of stylists…”

I’d even settle for “Man, I think I’m ugly when I cry. This insane pressure on women to be flawless at all times sure is skewing my perception of reality.”

Sigh. Sometimes I think if I stayed on celebrity blogs enough my brains would actually leak out of my ears. I really need my new bras for review to arrive…

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments