Flashback to the fifties: Bestform Lingerie reviewed

Bestform White Lingerie

I am not one of those girls who believes everyone needs a white bra in their lingerie cupboard. Quite the opposite: I am rather biased against the damn things – a prejudice born from my teenage years of only having white bras (from boxes, so shameful were my *enormous* mid-pubescent breasts to the Marks & Spencer shop floor) to choose from at all.

Fifteen years of D+ boobs later, I can now see there is something rather intriguing about pristine and pretty white lingerie. And admit, that now I’m not hiding my titchy teenage body underneath giant hoodies and mens’ shirts, that sometimes a white bra can come in handy under certain fabrics too.

But what to choose? I know Freya’s Jolie still comes in white, but I’m not ready to forgive the style for killing all my favourite colours. I’m on a mission to find the perfect white bra for my collection.

Formerly Vanity Fair Lingerie, Bestform have been making lingerie since the early 50s. The style today still reflects this – this white bra is classic ‘vintage 50s’ – not in the pin-up pointy fashion, but in a classic, everyday way. Think Betty Draper in casual mode: heaps of fine lace detailing in a functional shape and style.

I tried my more-often-than-not size 30G, and the fit was perfect and extremely comfortable – and firm. It’s worth noting that the shoulder straps come up shorter than other brands, so it’s well worth investigating if you struggle with that. It also has very discreet inner slings, so if you need padding in either or both cups it’s a great option.

The style isn’t quite mine, so my quest continues. But with such a great fit, this is a cracking little bra, and I’m very glad to have discovered it.

What’s your favourite white bra?

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Gossard vs Good Fit: the battle continues

Gossard Badly Fitting BraRegular readers may remember the battle Busts 4 Justice had with Gossard’s fairly questionable bra calculator and fitting advice a while back.

To their credit, they reached out and have been working on the situation. I was very disappointed then, to read this this afternoon:

Hi Becky (sic),

This week, as promised, we organised for two women to come into the office to get fitted using your +0 idea, in order to compare to the traditional +4 method.

The first of our models measured 32 underband and 40 overbust. This meant that Gossard measured her at a 36F, however our model expressed that she would merely use this as a starting point, as she in fact feels most comfortable in a 34FF. Using the proposed method by Bras4Justice (sic), this would mean our model’s starting point would be a size 32G, or in relative terms 30GG.

With this new calculation we asked our model to try a 32FF. Unfortunately she was unable to get the bra to fit, as she felt the band size was too tight and uncomfortable, therefore opting for the 34 band instead. This would mean she would measure a 34F, one band size smaller than Gossard’s original calculations, or one cup size smaller than the size our model actually wears.

The second model was unfortunately absent, so we were unable to use this method on another larger busted model.

It is Gossard’s view that although, for the minority of women, the +4 method may not work, for the majority, it is in fact an excellent starting point. If we were to use the +0 method we believe many women would experience the same frustration as our model experienced, that the band size they are given does not in fact feel comfortable as it is too small, and they would have to increase their band size. However, we understand that, from the Busts4Justice point of view, the traditional method may leave women feeling as though the band size they have received is too large, so there is obviously a compromise to be had.

We believe that this compromise should be in ensuring that we increase the information on our website, which will increase the options women have when choosing their bra size. Our current measuring calculator states that the size you receive will in fact be an estimate and is a starting point, not a definitive answer, especially for women above a DD. We also state that in order to get the size most suitable for your measurements, it is best to get measured by a professional. In addition to this information, what we aim to achieve is an informative guide for women which allows women to either use our sizing application, or our sizing chart for a starting bra size.

Gossard is also dedicated in informing women on how to correctly measure themselves, as we have found that many women in the UK have been misinformed that measuring without a bra is in fact the best method. There is the possibility that this fact is the reason as to why many women, especially those with larger busts, are wearing the wrong size. If you are measuring your breasts whilst they are not supported correctly you will in fact get an inaccurate measurement of the overband, however if you had a bra which supported you correctly in the first instance, you would not be trying to find your true bra size! On our website we will also be introducing a separate guide explaining how to use the theory of relativity, and how to know whether to go up or down a size using the most common complaints from women, e.g. ‘ spilling from the cup.’

Kind Regards,

Jade
Courtaulds Brands Ltd (Gossard & Berlei)

Can you spot the fundamental flaw in their argument here? They weren’t using their bra calculator algorithm in the test! My response:

Hi Jade,

Thanks for replying. I have to say, I’m a little disappointed. I have a couple of points though:

“It is Gossard’s view that although, for the minority of women, the +4 method may not work, for the majority, it is in fact an excellent starting point.”

The reverse is actually true – there has been a recent study proving this – you can read about it here: . I also have the full download if you would like to read it in more detail. In any case…

“The first of our models measured 32 underband and 40 overbust. This meant that Gossard measured her at a 36F, however our model expressed that she would merely use this as a starting point, as she in fact feels most comfortable in a 34FF. Using the proposed method by Bras4Justice (sic), this would mean our model’s starting point would be a size 32G, or in relative terms 30GG.”

This is not true to the bra calculator we’re talking about, which would actually have put her in a 36D. The bra calculator worked out the cup size from the difference between the underbust +4/5″ measurement.

When you consider this, a starting point of 32G (which is actually equivalent to a 34FF) is a much better starting point than a 34D – which is not even an equivalent cup volume.

With this new calculation we asked our model to try a 32FF. Unfortunately she was unable to get the bra to fit, as she felt the band size was too tight and uncomfortable, therefore opting for the 34 band instead. This would mean she would measure a 34F, one band size smaller than Gossard’s original calculations, or one cup size smaller than the size our model actually wears.

Why didn’t you try her in a 32G, as the calculation suggested? I personally believe that Gossard bras do come up tight in the band, but it will feel even tighter if the cup is a size too small.

I thought this was supposed to be a fair and controlled experiment, but it has been incredibly variable. Personally I would advise you to do it again – and properly – before proceeding further with your revisions.

Finally, a bra calculator/starting point means nothing if it not supported by clear and accurate visual guides and product shown on models wearing correctly fitting bras. Historically, Gossard have been bad at this – rendering any ‘starting point’ useless. Is there any plan to address this?

I genuinely do appreciate you investigating this, but it’s important Gossard do not miss this opportunity to address their fitting issues for their customers.

Best wishes, Beckie

Arg. I’ll keep you posted. Love from Bras4Justice (wtf?)

Posted in News, War on Plus Four | 17 Comments

Less than thrilled: my adventures with Curvy Kate’s Showgirl continue…

curvy-kate-thrill-me-peach-plum-padded-bra(2)

My adventures with Curvy Kate’s hugely popular Showgirl range continue with Thrill Me. Is it as tempting as Tempt Me?

Er, no. This doesn’t happen very often, but I just don’t really like this bra at all. In terms of fit it’s fine, although it is HUGE in the back so size down there and size up in the cup. I can find balconette styles tricky (a bony and slightly flared rib cage can be a nightmare in this style), and in spite of that it seems comfortable enough. But could I see myself choosing this over my other bras, ever? I doubt it.

I’m all for frivolity, but Thrill Me goes beyond thrilling and verges on the hysterical. It feels like a bra trying way too hard. There’s so much going on – satin shine, ribbon, ruffles, bows, spidery lace – all of which render this bra utterly useless for me to wear under clothes. And that’s before you consider the cleavage. I like making an impact once in a while, but my boobs haven’t looked so huge – or broad – since rescuing them from E-cups. Sure, the cleavage is effective if you need to stop traffic – but it’s so distracting that I feel reduced to a pair of tits on legs. Not the best feeling.

There’s been a lot of love for Thrill Me in the past, but it just leaves me cold. Interestingly enough it has not made a reappearance in 2012 either, although Tease Me (below) is remarkable similar (fussy, frilly, though marginally less shiny), and supposedly with similar sizing idiosyncrasies. I’ll have to try that to see if Curvy Kate can convert me to their hardcore Showgirl fanclub yet…

Thrill Me is still available from outlets like Brastop in a variety of sizes.

Curvy Kate Tease Me

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Can I tempt you? Curvy Kate’s scarlet Showgirl reviewed

ImageCurvy Kate’s unstoppable rise to global domination may have been spearheaded by its ingenious Star in a Bra model search competition , but it’s its incredibly popular lingerie (especially the hugely popular Showgirl collection) that is the real power behind the throne.

But for some reason, in spite of its inexorable popularity in the wider blogging community, I’d never managed to try it myself. Disgraced, I used my recent Brastop splurge to rectify this absurd oversight.

Tempt Me is definitely more, erm, bordello-y than I usually wear every day, but it is precisely the bright colours, extravagant details, and boudoir finish that make it such a popular style. There’s a huge amount of detailing involved for such an inexpensive bra: Tempt Me has satin button details, detailed patterned lace overlaying the satin cups, and bows all vying for attention. Not that once on any onlookers would stand a chance of noticing – because it really does give an astonishing cleavage.

Tempt Me Curvy Kate Close

The cups are slightly wide set, though with such a narrow center gore this didn’t pose as many problems as a balconette style might. The back is nice and snug, although judging by my slight quadraboob and side-spill it runs slightly small in the cup. It might be worth sizing up there – I definitely need a 30GG to avoid any escapage.

It’s an extremely dramatic bra and a very deep plunge – and there’s no doubt that Tempt Me is not a bra for wallflowers or people standing near others operating heavy machinery. This is a bra designed to be noticed. But it’s also designed to be comfortable and supported, and – most importantly – fun. It is bordello, but its sexiness is sincere and not cliche (or itchy) in the way some other *cough, Ann Summers, cough* high street attempts at ‘sexiness’ can be. A cracking litte bra for the brave.

Oh, and on another note I love silly high waisted pants. A girl can never have too many high waisted pants. More of those, please.

Tempt Me is available in a wide range of sizes, from 28-38 D-J (with some exceptions). But more exciting is this new midnight colourway for Autumn (available September 12) – which simply by not being red is less bordello and more oo helloooo. One to watch.

Curvy Kate Midnight Blue Tempt Me Lingerie

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Flummoxed by Fiore: Lepel’s bestselling plunge reviewed

lepel-fiore-blue-pink-padded-plunge-bra

Lepel’s bestselling Fiore has been on my radar for a while now – not least because of the pretty colours (helloooo mint green and strawberry!) – but for some reason it was only a review request from a reader that prompted me to actually order.

I wonder if my bradar was warning me off, because this bra and I did not become fast friends. Though I love how it looks on smaller busted models, when confronted with a G-cup the bra is slightly raggedy and cumbersome. It comes with light padding, plus an extra removable padding in a sling at in the lower cup – somewhat gratuitous when you’re already packing a G-unit, but not something that presents too much of a challenge if you don’t fancy the extra oomph… assuming, of course, that there’s enough room in the cup to start with.

But the cups are tiny. And the band is big. I so wanted to love this bra, but this bra just didn’t want to love me back. With padding the quadraboob is cataclysmic, without it’s not too bad up top if I’m still, although the underwire simply cannot tack to my chest and the centre gore never gets closer than a centimetre away from my sternum. In many respects, this bra fits me like a 34D – to the point that I checked every single tag twice for a labelling mistake. I know 30G is my ‘starting point’ size – but I’d need more than a Tom Tom to point me in the direction with this bra. I have never known a bra fit quite so disastrously – or fit so small whilst looking so damned big!

Has anyone else experienced this with Lepel?

If you’d like B4J to check something out for you (hopefully with a happy ending!), feel free to drop by on Facebook or Twitter and send in a request.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 13 Comments